top of page

Emma Steele (Ascension) & Emily Trant (Wagestream): Building ventures where profit and purpose scale together

  • Writer: ImpactVC
    ImpactVC
  • Jul 2, 2025
  • 2 min read
The Impact Highlight is joined by Emma Steele (Partner at Ascension) and Emily Trant (Head of Impact at Wagestream), two of the most vocal champions for mission-aligned tech in Europe.

In this episode, we explore the nuances of building and backing commercial businesses that generate genuine social value. Emma and Emily reflect on where the commercial model does work for impact, where it doesn’t, and why intent matters as much as outcomes.


From designing products that serve vulnerable users to structuring impact advisory boards that challenge you, this is a real look into how impact venture plays out at the fund and founder level.



🎯 This Episode’s Themes:

  • What “tech for good” actually looks like in venture

  • Building scalable impact and sustainable returns

  • How to think about charity vs commercial models

  • Why intent and design matter more than labels

  • How impact boards can go wrong—and how to make them work



Here’s what’s covered:

  • 00:40 | Meet Emma & Emily: Impact VC meets operating at scale

  • 02:30 | What Is “Impact” Anyway? And why Ascension never used the label

  • 06:15 | Wagestream’s Model: Serving those who can’t pay—at scale

  • 10:00 | Market Failures & Margin Models: Why commercial still wins

  • 13:00 | Data That Matters: From savings behavior to sleep quality

  • 17:00 | Charity vs Commercial: The tension no one likes to talk about

  • 20:15 | Impact Boards: How to make them useful (hint: be honest)

  • 24:30 | The Venture Fit: Why scale and impact aren’t opposites

  • 28:00 | Calling Future Founders: Be intentional from day one






✍️ Show Notes


The Hidden Impact in Commercial Ventures

Emily breaks down why Wagestream’s scale is precisely why its impact is so significant—and how focusing only on “non-commercial” ventures misses the bigger picture.


Tech for Good Doesn’t Need a Label

Emma shares why Ascension never called itself an impact fund—but built one of the best “tech for good” portfolios in Europe anyway.


From Product to Outcomes

Collecting data on stress, control, and behavior change is key. It’s not just about reach—it’s about real change in users’ lives.


Making Advisory Boards Actually Work

Most impact boards fall flat. Emily shares how transparency—not posturing—makes theirs valuable.


Build with Purpose

Both guests agree: founders with clear, embedded impact intent from day one are the ones who scale it successfully.


💡 Investor Takeaway

Commercial models and social outcomes aren’t at odds. The best ventures use the tools of tech and capital to solve real problems—and do it at scale. As Emma and Emily show, being “impact-driven” isn’t about charity. It’s about intention, execution, and outcomes.

bottom of page